Flyby News Home - Flyby News Archives - Casinni NoFlyby - Flyby Links

Flyby  News

"News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era"

PrimaryQuestion * Edwards * Clark * Kerry * Lies

27 January 2004

1) Dennis Kucinich and the Question
- - "I Love Kucinich But He Can't Win"...
- - Kucinich: This Will Go to Convention
2) John Edwards: Angry-About-the-War Candidate
3) "Democracy Now!" Confronts Wesley Clark

- - US judge rules part of Patriot Act unlawful
4) John F. Kerry and Skull and Bones
5) MI6's source on Iraqi WMD claim says it was untrue

- - US judge rules part of Patriot Act unlawful

Editor's Notes:

“America is a Nation with a mission -- and that mission comes from our most basic beliefs. We have no desire to dominate, no ambitions of empire. Our aim is a democratic peace -- a peace founded upon the dignity and rights of every man and woman.” This quote came from the lips of George W. Bush at The State of the Union Address on January 20, 2004. I believe that most Americans saw through these lies, based on realities of war profiteering and corruption, plans to attack Iraq at the beginnings of this administration, and based on the unmentioned deaths that continue to haunt the American psyche. When will this end?

The first item is about when “fear ends and hope begins.” This leading article by William Rivers Pitt offers a keen insight into the candidacy and direction of Dennis Kucinich for US President. “This run for the White House is about far more than winning that office. If you think the end of the primaries will spell the end of his run, think again..” The work for transforming policies for unending war to unending peace has only just begun. The big question seems to be, how much change are people ready for now?

John Nichols is the author of the Nation article on John Edwards in item 2. I was wondering about the rise of this one-term-Senator becoming a serious contender for the Democratic nomination. Perhaps there is something to Edwards, (described by Nichols as “..a freshfaced and energetic contender who exudes awshucks optimism..”) that reveals something deeper about the American electorate, and perhaps about the influence of appearances, or innocence? Edwards, who voted for the war, also voted against the Bush administration's request for $87 billion to maintain the occupation, and seems to be on a learning curve with the rest of America as fatalities to American armed service personnel has climbed over the 500 mark.

But where Edwards projects a possible innocence, Wesley Clark projects a darker side as the Commander of NATO when innocent people were killed needlessly, and depleted Uranium continues to pollute the environment in Europe. Following that item is more information on John Kerry’s unholy alliance with the Bush administration, and partnership with the Skull and Bones society. I listened to John Kerry in Keene. He responded to a question for a US Department of Peace, as proposed by Dennis Kucinich in Congress. Kerry arrogantly chimed that the department of peace is the responsibility of the US President. Yet when a veteran questioned about his being “fooled” on the vote to authorize George W. Bush for a preemptive strike, he claimed he was misled by intelligence at that time. The intelligence of fear-induced activities can often be misleading. Item 5 gives more details on the revelations of lies and betrayal, and glimmer of hope as a US judge ruled that part of the Patriot Act is unlawful.

Flyby News has updated its main page and promotional flyer.

These are the updated stories now featured:

  • The Bush Conspiracy and 9/11 Investigative Reports, looking into the unanswered questions

  • The campaign to elect Dennis J. Kucinich and Democrat Nominee for US President in 2004

  • Mid East Peace Initiatives and Nonviolent Resolutions

  • Updates to stop weapons and nuclear power in space

  • Exposing the harm by exposure to exploded depleted uranium shells

  • The harmful impact on Whales/Dolphins by the experimental use of active sonar systems

  • The mounting evidences of Global Warming & Sustainable Energy/Technology Development

  • Exclusive updates on Bart Jordan, evidences of technologically advanced ancient civilizations

  • News from inside the movements to free political prisoners, and other human rights issues

  • Personal Accounts on a Friend Shot Dead by Police in a Church in Brattleboro, Vermont

  • Please support this work. Contact us for flyers to post in your community, and please consider donating financial support. Our account due at the printers is close to $200. We also would like order 1,000 bumper stickers. We plan to continue working in support of our campaigns. through the year 2012. Thanks for reading and efforts for peace and justice.

    Flyby News
    P.O. Box 1999
    Wendell Depot, MA 01380 USA

    1) Dennis Kucinich and the Question

    - - "I Love Kucinich But He Can't Win"...
    - - Kucinich: This Will Go to Convention

    Dennis Kucinich and the Question
    By William Rivers Pitt

    t r u t h o u t | Perspective
    Friday 23 January 2004

    Cuz take away our Playstations
    And we are a third world nation
    Under the thumb of some blue blood royal son
    Who stole the Oval Office and that phony election
    I mean
    It don't take a weatherman
    To look around and see the weather
    Jeb said he'd deliver Florida, folks
    And boy did he ever…

    And we hold these truths to be self evident
    #1: George W. Bush is not President
    #2: America is not a true democracy
    #3: the media is not fooling me
    Cuz I am a poem heeding hyper-distillation
    I've got no room for a lie so verbose
    I'm looking out over my whole human family
    And I'm raising my glass in a toast…

    - Ani DiFranco, "Self-Evident"

    The three most powerful letters in American politics are ‘FDR.' Franklin Roosevelt unleashed a political revolution so powerful and complete that it required the incredible extremism of the Bush administration to bring it to heel. That is not to say the revolution wasn't flagging before George took the Oval Office chair. Democratic Presidents and Presidential hopefuls have been running on Roosevelt rhetoric since the titan died in his fourth term, but the facts on the ground are clear. The country has been steadily retreating from the legacy of FDR for decades.

    Enter Dennis Kucinich, Democratic congressman from Ohio, former Mayor of Cleveland, and candidate for President in 2004. There is not a single polling indicator that puts him above ten percent support at this point, and he managed only a 1% showing in the Iowa caucuses. Pragmatism dictates that he is merely tilting at windmills, but a closer look reveals something far different in play.

    Kucinich came on next. It was clear that many in the crowd were not familiar with him. That was about to change.

    "I come from Cleveland, Ohio," began Kucinich. "I'm the oldest of seven children. My parents never owned a home, and as the family grew, we kept moving because we outgrew the apartments that we lived in. During the 1950s, there used to be ads in the newspapers that would say ‘No Children' or ‘One Child Only.' If you had a large family and didn't own a home, you were out of luck. So our family kept moving from place to place. By the time I was 17 years old, we had lived in 21 different places, including a couple of cars."

    "That experience," he continued, "growing up in the city of Cleveland, and living in so many different neighborhoods, and moving from place to place, that experience informs greatly my passion for public service, and my reasons for running for President of the United States. I know that it matters to people to have a job, to have a living wage, to have decent health care, that their kids can go to decent schools, that they live in decent neighborhoods, that they have a roof over their heads. I understand this. I understand it because these are the kinds of concerns that my parents had to deal with when we were growing up. These are the kinds of concerns that many families have to deal with today."

    ..This country is losing its connection with its people. My Presidency will be about reconnecting America with the practical aspirations of the American people."

    By this time, the crowd had risen, somewhat surprised with itself, to its feet in approval several times. Dennis Kucinich? Rocking the house?

    "I want you, the taxpayers, to think about this," said Kucinich after the applause had died down again. "If we're in Iraq for a few years, the cost will be over a half a trillion dollars. That's going to come out of our budget for housing, for education, for health care. Casualties are now over five hundred, and could go into the thousands. Why? When is enough enough? I say enough is enough right now, and that's why we need to get the troops out, and that's why I'm ready to lead in that direction."

    .. "Ten years ago," he said in a rising voice, "the United States passed agreements called NAFTA and the WTO which created conditions where global corporations are setting all the rules for trade. You know what it is about? You know what it is about. It is about cheap labor. Wherever they can drive down wages, they do it. Wherever they can get someone to do a job for less than nothing, that's what they are looking for. They don't care about child labor, prison labor, slave labor, they don't care about crushing workers. What they care about is being able to make more and more of a profit. They don't care if they close down a community."

    "They don't care if they crush small businesses," he said, now in full roar. "They don't care because they have the power, with NAFTA and the WTO, and all these trade agreements, to just move jobs out of this country, move out the manufacturing jobs, move out high-tech jobs, move out any kind of job that exists in this country that they can make a better buck off in another country by crushing workers rights. I've seen it. It is time to put an end to it."

    The thunder of the audience shook the room..

    ..It comes down to this. Dennis Kucinich is running for President, but he is also formulating a national movement that will be in place long after the race is run. This movement, in all 50 states, will stand ready to defend the most basic American principles that have been lost for years. The movement stands for the workers. The movement stands for the families. The movement stands for the environment. The movement stands for health care. The movement stands for peace.

    The movement stands for America. During his speech in Dubuque, Kucinich said, "My campaign is about bringing the end of fear in this country, the fear which keeps us from standing up for our own interests, the fear which causes people to take positions that are against the interests of the American people. The red in our flag stands for courage, not fear. The white in our flag stands for purity. The blue in our flag stands for loyalty. When Francis Scott Key wrote the Star-Spangled banner, he posed a riddle to all of us. He asked a question. Does that Star-Spangled banner yet wave in the land of the free and the home of the brave? He made the connection between freedom and bravery, between courage and democracy."

    "My candidacy," he said in Dubuque, "is about calling forth the fearlessness that exists in the heart of every American, calling forth the courage to meet each day on its own terms. Without fear, with confidence, with hope, with the anticipation that we can meet the challenges, whether they be terrorism or poverty. This campaign is about a celebration of who we are as Americans, about the path of fearlessness that will lead us forward in the world, about the path of courage which will lead us to a country where we have health care for all, jobs for all, education for all, and peace in the world. We are capable of this. It is time to create a new America. The time is now. The time is now."

    Dennis Kucinich reminds people why they are Democrats, why they are progressives, in the first place. He is the soul and the spirit of those beliefs personified, he is Franklin Delano Roosevelt returned, walking and talking and preaching in the 21st century. Anyone who doubts this has not seen the man in action, has not met the people who surround him and support him.

    This run for the White House is about far more than winning that office. If you think the end of the primaries will spell the end of his run, think again. If the Democratic Party should win the White House in 2004, a powerful progressive network will have to be in place to push the new administration in the right direction, and against the tide that has been unleashed. This is what Dennis Kucinich is constructing, one brick at a time.

    This tide has only just begun to rise. How much change are you ready for?


    For the complete article, see:

    William Rivers Pitt is the Managing Editor of He is a New York Times and international best-selling author of three books - "War On Iraq," available from Context Books, "The Greatest Sedition is Silence," available from Pluto Press, and "Our Flag, Too: The Paradox of Patriotism," available in August from Context Books.

    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    - - "I Love Kucinich But He Can't Win"...
    Tad Daley: Top Ten Responses To --
    Published on Monday, January 26, 2004 by

    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    - - Kucinich: This Will Go to Convention

    January 19, 2004

    "As part of my strategy in the Iowa caucuses, I worked out an arrangement with Senator Edwards that may have allowed each of us to pick up a few more delegates. Our supporters, of course, ultimately chose their own courses of action. But none were left with their only strategic choice being leaving their caucus and going home. John and I are friends and I wish him the best. But we have 49 states left to go, and we're each on our own."

    For the complete press release, see:
    Kucinich: This Will Go to Convention

    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    How Much Change are YOU ready for?

    2) John Edwards: Angry-About-the-War Candidate

    Published on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 by The Nation

    Angry-About-the-War Candidate
    by John Nichols

    John Edwards is not running for the Democratic nomination as an anti-war candidate. Even in a campaign that has been defined by nothing so much as a constant process of redefinition on the parts of the major candidates, that would be too much of a stretch. After all, Edwards voted with more enthusiasm than most Democrats for the October, 2002, resolution that authorized George W. Bush to use force against Iraq. And long after another senator who voted for the war resolution, John Kerry, began to grumble about Bush's deceptions and missteps, Edwards continued to defend his vote and the war.

    But, while Edwards is not running as an anti-war candidate, he has begun to run as an angry-about-the-war candidate. And in the competition for the votes of Democratic caucus and primary voters, that anger is serving him well. The North Carolina senator ran a surprisingly strong second in last Monday night's caucuses Iowa -- a state where exit polls showed 75 percent of Democratic caucus goers were opposed to the war in Iraq. And polls suggest that he could ride a last-minute surge into a solid third-place finish in Tuesday's primary in New Hampshire, a New England state where anti-war sentiments seem to be only slightly less pronounced than in the Midwest.

    How is it that Edwards is doing so well with voters who think of themselves as anti-war?

    How was the senator able to elbow aside former Vermont Governor Howard Dean, who spoke out against the 2002 resolution before the vote was taken, in anti-war Iowa? How is it that he now seems to be elbowing aside retired General Wesley Clark, another critic of the rush-to-war resolution, in New Hampshire? And why did the most genuinely anti-war candidate in the race, Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chair Dennis Kucinich, urge his backers in Iowa to caucus with Edwards?

    One line of analysis holds that the war isn't really that big an issue. Under this theory, Democratic caucus and primary voters are not all that interested in a war that has now cost more than 500 American lives, untold Iraqi lives, and tens of billions of U.S. tax dollars. But anyone who has followed the campaign knows that is not the case, as voters regularly question candidates about the war.

    Another line of analysis holds that Democrats are so obsessed with beating Bush in 2004 that they are willing to overlook any flaw, even a disagreeable stance on so pivotal a concern as the war, in their search for the most electable candidate. That may explain the rise of Kerry, a four-term senator who also happens to be a decorated Vietnam War veteran. But it doesn't account for the rise of Edwards, a one-term senator who also happens to be a millionaire trial lawyer.

    There is no question that Edwards works hard to presents himself as an "electable" contender. But that does not mean that he is eschewing appeals to anti-war Democrats. Indeed, while Edwards may not be an anti-war candidate, he has made complaints about the war central themes of his surging candidacy.

    When Edwards and his aides gave their campaign a makeover toward the end of 2003, they radically retooled the candidate's message. At the heart of the new Edwards stump speech was an economic populist appeal designed to highlight the divide between "two Americas" -- one where the rich get all the breaks, another where working families can't get a break. New York Times columnist William Safire is right when he says that Edwards "has honed his 'two Americas' theme into the smoothest call for enforced leveling since Huey Long's 'every man a king.'" But don't assume that Edwards is only talking about domestic economics. That smooth speech also features an anti-war profiteering rap passionate enough to warm the hearts -- and perhaps win the votes -- of even some committed anti-warriors.

    "We need to end the sweetheart deals for Halliburton and stop the war profiteering in Iraq," Edwards began telling the crowds, making pointed references to Vice President Dick Cheney's former firm but also to a list of other defense contractors that have contributed heavily to George w. Bush's campaigns and that have profited heavily from his war.

    While Edwards does not echo the pure anti-war rhetoric of a Dean, a Clark or, particularly, a Kucinich or an Al Sharpton, the North Carolinian does toss red meat to anti-war Democrats -- highlighting the corruptions of empire that infuriate grassroots Democrats. It is easy, and quite possibly appropriate, to be cynical about the way in which Edwards now highlights criticism of a war that he has supported more consistently even than Kerry. But voters seem to be willing to forgive Edwards, a fresh-faced and energetic contender who exudes aw-shucks optimism on the trail, more than they do the other candidates.

    The anti-war profiteering rhetoric helps to explain why Edwards ran almost as well as Dean did among Iowa Democrats who said the war was their top issue. It also helps to explain why the campaign of Dennis Kucinich, the most passionately anti-war of the Democratic presidential candidates, felt comfortable urging supporters of the Ohio congressman to form caucus-night alliance that aided Edwards.

    In New Hampshire, Edwards has upped the ante. After President Bush used his State of the Union address to list 17 of the 34 nations that have committed troops to help the U.S. maintain the occupation of Iraq, Edwards went on New Hampshire Public Radio and condemned the president for claiming that he has assembled a genuine coalition to maintain the occupation of Iraq. For the most part, Edwards charged, the other countries provide little more than window dressing, while the toll of U.S. casualties rises and the cost to U.S. taxpayers mounts. (Like Kerry, Edwards votes against the Bush administration's fall 2003 request for $87 billion to maintain the occupation, as did Kucinich. Of the remaining contenders, only Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, the candidate of Democrats who don't really disagree all that much with Bush, voted for the spending bill.)

    Over the weekend, as Tuesday's New Hampshire vote approached, Edwards was adding to his angry-about-the-war repertoire. Edwards leapt on statements made by David Kay, the man entrusted by the Bush administration to head the hunt for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. When Kay resigned Friday, he told the Reuters news agency that he had concluded there were no stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons to be found in Iraq. Edwards immediately called for an independent commission to investigate whether the Bush administration misled the Congress when the president and White House aides were making the case for preemptive war against Iraq.

    "It's a serious issue and it's why I'm calling for an independent commission to investigate the discrepancy between what's been found there and what we were told before," Edwards said of the ongoing debate over Bush's claim that the U.S. needed to attack Iraqi weapons -- or, at the least, weapons that country was very close to developing -- posed a genuine threat. Edwards still stops short of saying that Bush lied to the Congress and the American people; rather, he says, "That's exactly why we need an independent commission to get to the bottom of this."

    Even as he was calling for the investigation, Edwards was ramping up that razor-sharp rhetoric about war profiteering. When Halliburton agreed on Friday to pay $6.3 million to the U.S. Army to cover for overbilling by a Kuwaiti subcontractor supplying U.S. troops in Iraq, Edwards said, "The American people know there is something wrong going on with war profiteering and Halliburton and the contracts in Iraq."

    "This has got to come to an end," the senator told a crowd of 700 cheering supporters in Rochester, New Hampshire. Edwards promised them that, if elected president, he would examine all the contracts handed out by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his aides "with a magnifying glass" in a hunt to halt "the fleecing of the American people."

    Copyright © 2004 The Nation

    3) "Democracy Now!" Confronts Wesley Clark

    EXCLUSIVE: DEMOCRACY NOW! Confronts Wesley Clark Over His Bombing Of Civilians, Use Of Cluster Bombs And Depleted Uranium And The Bombing Of Serb Television

    In a Democracy Now! exclusive, General Wesley Clark responds for the first time to in-depth questions about his targeting of civilian infrastructure in Yugoslavia, his bombing of Radio Television Serbia, the use of cluster bombs and depleted uranium, the speeding-up of the cockpit video of a bombing of a passenger train to make it appear as though it was an accident and other decisions he made and orders he gave as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander.

    Since the 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia, General Wesley Clark has not answered any in-depth questions about his targeting of civilian infrastructure in Yugoslavia, his bombing of Radio Television Serbia, the use of cluster bombs and depleted uranium, the speeding-up of the cockpit video of a bombing of a passenger train to make it appear as though it was an accident and other decisions he made and orders he gave as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander.

    With the New Hampshire primary just 24 hours away, the remaining Democratic candidates are in their final push to win votes in the key poll in the Granite state. Whether or not Howard Dean wins or loses, he set the tone very early for what has become a definitive issue in the race early on: opposition to the war in Iraq. Among the Democrats, Dennis Kucinich, Al Sharpton and Carol Moseley Braun held the most clear antiwar stances. But Braun has pulled out of the race, Al Sharpton is not in New Hampshire and Dennis Kucinich - well the media hardly gives him any airtime.

    With the exception of Senator Joseph Lieberman, all of the candidates have sought to portray themselves as opponents of the war. But only Kucinich has announced a concrete plan for withdrawing US forces from Iraq. The theme of Iraq is the main issue on which General Wesley Clark is running his campaign.

    Click here to read transcript and for link to video/audio of
    Jeremy Scahill questioning General Wesley Clark

    4) John F. Kerry and Skull and Bones

    Kerry made his Bones in secret club - like Bush:[All Editions]
    Andrew Miga. Boston Herald. Boston, Mass.: May 15, 2003. pg. 004
    Section: NEWS - from the Boston Herald newspaper –

    Abstract (Article Summary)

    Bonesmen already are buzzing over the prospect of the first Bones vs. Bones presidential race should Kerry win his party's nomination and face [Bush] in 2004. Kerry was tapped for the club in 1968, two years after Bush, whose father and grandfather were also Bonesmen. Kerry's brother-in- law from his first marriage, David Thorne, was Bones. So was the late husband of Kerry's current wife, ...

    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    For more on this story about Skull and Bones, Bush and Kerry, see:

    5) MI6's source on Iraqi WMD claim says it was untrue

    - - US judge rules part of Patriot Act unlawful

    MI6's source on Iraqi WMD claim says it was untrue

    The British government's dogged insistence that Saddam Hussein was able to deploy weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes of the order being given suffered two serious blows yesterday as ministers braced themselves for the findings of the Hutton inquiry. The Iraqi exile group in London which claims to have supplied MI6 with the intelligence about Saddam's 45-minute capability admitted that the information might have been completely untrue.

    The Guardian [UK], 27 January 2004 -- link to following URL click for article,13747,1131993,00.html

    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    - - US judge rules part of Patriot Act unlawful

    For the first time, a federal judge has declared unconstitutional a section of the USA Patriot Act that bars giving expert advice or assistance to groups designated foreign terrorist organizations. In a ruling handed down late Friday and made available Monday, US District Judge Audrey Collins said the ban is vague in its wording. David Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who argued the case on behalf of the Humanitarian Law Project, declared the ruling "a victory for everyone who believes the war on terrorism ought to be fought consistent with constitutional principles."

    For the complete article from The National Post [Canada], 26 January 2004
    click following URL:

    Links and summaries in this item via: The News Insider

    The views expressed herein are the writers' own and not necessarily those of Flyby News.
    A "Fair Use Policy" that describes Flyby News' use of copyrighted material is posted at
    Your feedback for story suggestions and networking Flyby News are welcomed and appreciated.
    You can write to the publisher/editor Jonathan Mark via email:

    Flyby News is educational and nonviolent in focus, and has supported critical campaigns
    for a healthy environment, human rights, justice, peace, and nonviolence,
    since the launching of NASA's Cassini space probe in 1997.

    =====News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era====>

    = = = = = = = = = = =

    Email address: