Flyby News Home - Flyby News Archives - Casinni NoFlyby - Flyby Links

Flyby  News

"News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era"

Habeas Corpus * WTC Collapse * JFKreserve

02 October 2006

"The 9/11 families must play a leading role in place of a lying
and evasive administration, and a pliant Congressional leadership
all too willing to disregard countervailing facts, inconvenient
evidence and excessive secrecy -- The message these
families bring must be heard, loud and clear."

Kyle Hence

writer, producer
“9/11: Press for Truth”

This film will be screened with Kyle Hence at
Hampshire College - Amherst, MA
October 10, 2006; 7:00 PM

1) Habeas Corpus, R.I.P. (1215 - 2006)
- - Iraq: The Week the Truth was Told
- - Musharraf: US threatened to bomb Pakistan after 9/11
- - Cluster bombs imperil southern Lebanon
- - JFK vs. The Federal Reserve
2) Impeach the President – VT Congress Candidate Stands Up
- - Please cancel my subscription to Counterpunch
- - 9/11 Mysteries – Free-Fall Buildings Analyzed
- - “Improbable Collapse” Released!

Editor's Notes:

"9/11: Press for Truth" may be the best introductory film for many to learn about unanswered 9/11 questions and cover-up. The lives of families most touched can help bring justice from tragedy. The second item includes information on a new film, 911 Mysteries. The Western Mass 9/11 Truth Alliance will be showing this film in Northampton on October 19. stated: “Hands down, the most detailed, accurate and persuasive documentary on the WTC collapses/demolitions yet to appear.” Steven E. Jones, physics professor, Brigham Young University, stated about 911 Mysteries: “Great insight into demolitions and what really happened on 9/11/2001." At the end of this second item, another new film on this subject was just released, called: “Improbable Collapse.” The 9/11 truth movement has wonderful resources to help awaken our friends and neighbors.

In the second item Vermont politics come into play. Check out information on Dennis Morrisseau, a candidate for VT Congress with the platform to Impeach Bush and Cheney. Note, too, the following Brattleboro action on the future of nuclear power.

Join With We the People

Revoke the Operating License
of the VT Yankee Nuclear Reactor

Join Bread and Puppet parade through Brattleboro
Start at the Brattleboro Memorial Hospital at 9:00 A.M.

All Are Welcome!
Those wishing to join the Civil Disobedience Action,
must receive Non-violent CD Training and join an affinity group
For civil disobedience training session in Mass. call 413-339-5781

12PM, October 16th, 2006
Entergy Headquarters, Brattleboro, VT

For more information see:

Following along in the backwards flow of the de-evolution of human intelligence, item one covers the Centuries-long demise of Habeas Corpus. This loss will not rest in peace. Also, can we make any sense why Israel would use toxic-leaking weapons to inflict such harm on their neighbors, themselves? Meanwhile the US Treasury continues to be looted. A new congressional analysis shows the Iraq war is now costing taxpayers almost $2 billion a week. The new Bob Woodward book is a classic case, similar to what had happened with Watergate, when insiders in the Party fought back to stop the downfall of an immoral leadership from taking everyone with them. The only trouble is that the layers of corruption never seem to end. Note the article on JFK and the Federal Reserve. Watch the debt grow; watch wars try to survive in a fake economy, while freedoms are eroded..

In his book, "History Will Not Absolve Us," Martin Shotz wrote: "One of the primary means of immobilizing the American people politically today is to hold them in a state of confusion in which anything can be believed and nothing can be known." Perhaps the best way to counteract this is with actual film footage and documentaries revealing evidence of 9/11 cover-up and unanswered questions. In the communications age, we don’t need Congress or the media to be on our side, the side of PC’s, we, the wired people, who can separate fiction from reality. Sooner or later a critical mass will demand answers. Keep the DVDs spinning! With this in mind the Western Mass 9/11 Truth Alliance will be offering 9/11 truth resources at Amy Goodman's Democracy Now event at Mt. Holyoke College, Chapin Hall, Wednesday October 4, 7pm.

One of the posters that will be on display, reads:



It clearly shows explosions with squibs.
It has several firefighter testimonies.
Then it has the shots of WTC7 collapsing,
with the infamous Silverstein "pull it" statement below.

Poster's PDF file and jpg link


October 19th, 7pm at the Media Education Foundation
The 9/11 Truth Alliance will be presenting a new film called:
911 Mysteries

Part 1: Demolitions

"It is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt,
one very important thing: the destruction of the World Trade Center
was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own government."

David Ray Griffin

Author, 9/11 Commission Report:
Omissions and Distortions.

1) Habeas Corpus, R.I.P. (1215 - 2006)

- - Iraq: The Week the Truth was Told
- - Musharraf: US threatened to bomb Pakistan after 9/11
- - Cluster bombs imperil southern Lebanon
- - JFK vs. The Federal Reserve

- - Habeas Corpus, R.I.P. (1215 - 2006)

With a smug stroke of his pen, President Bush exterminated
a safeguard against illegal imprisonment that has endured
as a cornerstone of legal justice since the Magna Carta.

For article by Molly Ivins, see:

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

From Thom Hartmann:


“Two of the most critical parts of the Magna Carta were articles 38 and 39, which established the foundation for what is now known as "habeas corpus" laws (literally, "produce the body" from the Latin - meaning, broadly, "let this person go free or else give him a trial - you may not hold him forever with charging him with a crime"). The concept of habeas corpus in the Magna Carta led directly to the Fourth through Eighth Amendments of our Constitution, and hundreds of other federal and state due process provisions.

Articles 38 and 39 of the Magna Carta said:

"38 In future no official shall place a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible witnesses to the truth of it.

"39 No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him,
or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land."

This was radical stuff, and over the next four hundred years average people increasingly wanted for themselves these same protections from the abuse of governmental power that the feudal lords had gotten at Runnymede. But from 1215 to 1628, outside of the privileges enjoyed by the feudal lords, the average person could be arrested and imprisoned at the whim of the king with no recourse to the courts.

Then, in 1627, King Charles I overstepped, and the people snapped. Charles I threw into jail five knights in a tax disagreement, and the knights sued the King, asserting their habeas corpus right to be free or on bail unless convicted of a crime.

King Charles I, in response, invoked his right to simply imprison anybody he wanted (other than the rich feudal lords), anytime he wanted, as he said, "per speciale Mandatum Domini Regis."

This is essentially the same argument that George W. Bush makes today for why he has the right to detain people without charges for as much as their entire lives solely on his own say-so: because he's in charge. And it's an argument now supported on the record by these Republicans who have chosen to betray America's founding principles in exchange for peace with the White House.

Now, the third George to govern the United States, 191 years later, isn't even bothering with the civilized step that King George III of England took, of asking Congress for a temporary suspension of habeas corpus for a particular situation. Instead, he's demanding that his Republican colleagues give him the sole power to do away with habeas corpus altogether..

The above was excerpt from Thom Harmann’s newsletter.
For Hartmann’s article, Published September 25, 2006 by
See: Republicans Give In To Bush, Betray America

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Iraq: The Week the Truth was Told
Published October 1, 2006 by the lndependent/UK
Iraq: The Week the Truth was Told (Except by Tony Blair)
by Rupert Cornwell

Secret intelligence assessments and public statements by former senior officials, the evidence presented in influential new books and in a simmering generals' revolt against the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, all deliver the same message: the Anglo-American war of choice, the invasion of a sovereign country in March 2003 not only was founded on false pretences. It also created more problems than it has solved.

For original article, see:

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Musharraf: US threatened to bomb Pakistan after 9/11

US threatened to bomb Pakistan 'back to stone age' after 9/11: Musharraf

The United States threatened to bomb Pakistan "back to the stone age" in 2001
unless it cooperated in the US-led war on terror, President Pervez Musharraf said in an interview.

Musharraf, whose support for the US-led invasion of Afghanistan was instrumental
in the fall of the hardline Taliban regime after the September 11, 2001 attacks,
said the threat came from former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage.

Truncated, for complete article, see:
US threatened to bomb Pakistan 'back to stone age' after 9/11: Musharraf

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"When the Missionaries Came to Africa, They Had the Bible & We Had the Land.
They Said "Let Us Pray." We Closed Our Eyes. When We Opened Them,
We Had the Bible & They Had the Land."

- Bishop Desmond Tutu

Received by FN via email,
Alex James, wrote:

“The real story is that Bush threatened to bomb Pakistan if Musharraf told the World the truth that the CIA invented and created bogeyman Binladen actually died 3 years ago. See insider Tom Henegan’s report at the end. Yesterday's story leaked by U.S. Media that Bush threatened to bomb Pakistan after 9-11 is a diversion from the real story. The real story is that Musharraf, Pakistani President, knows that Bin Laden is dead and knows where he is buried. And knows that the bogeyman died aka kidney failure, Jan. 2002.”

From the Stephen Cambone Notes

"Al Qaeda is nothing more than an extension of the operatus linked to U.S. intelligence that was allowed, by script, to remove itself as a rogue break away entity of the U.S. government; allowed to de-compartmentalize from oversight, and was run instead by Gary Best rogue black ops specialists for scripted activity outside of the U.S. government, with its funding being orchestrated through the Pakistani secret police, an entity of the U.S. government itself."

Thomas Heneghan,
International Intelligence Expert, Federal Whistleblower

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Cluster bombs imperil southern Lebanon

Pose huge threat to reconstruction, UN agency says
By Lin Noueihed, Reuters | September 27, 2006

BEIRUT -- Up to a million unexploded cluster bomblets from Israel's war with Hezbollah are now the biggest threat to civilians in south Lebanon, where they litter streets, homes, and orchards, UN agencies said yesterday.

Fourteen people have been killed and 90 wounded by unexploded ordnance since the end of the war in mid-August, with all the fatalities and most of the injuries caused by cluster munitions, the UN Mine Action Coordination Center said.

So far, the Lebanese Army, UN peacekeepers, the mine action center, and its contractors have cleared almost 40,000 unexploded cluster bomblets, but up to a million more remain.

With an estimated 12 to 15 months needed to clear the south of cluster bomblets, they pose mortal danger to displaced civilians returning to their villages after the 34-day war, the UN said.

Israel denies using cluster bombs illegally.

``The problem now rests with cluster bombs. They get caught up in bushes, in trees, in hedges. They get caught up in wire fences. . . .They are lying in people's houses, in their front gardens," Chris Clark, program manager of the UN Mine Action Coordination Center in southern Lebanon, said at a news conference.

``A lot of these cluster bombs, small as they are, are caught up in the rubble and pose a continuing problem to any reconstruction . . . but the main problem will be for people who just want to go back to their houses, clear the rubble out, and try to restore their lives."

Clarke said Israel also had yet to provide detailed information on the amounts of cluster bombs fired or the coordinates of the strikes, which would help munitions clearance teams identify the main areas on which to focus their efforts.

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees said some 200,000 Lebanese remained displaced, their return home slowed by the destruction of their houses and by unexploded bomblets.

With winter coming up and most people in the south relying on agriculture for their main source of income, the UNHCR is concerned that farmers will be unable to return to their fields, robbing them of their livelihood, or will face a deadly threat if they do as rain sinks the bomblets into the soil.

``Displacement, which we would have expected to end much more quickly, is going to continue for many, many more months to come. . . .We expect that instead of the displacement ending so people can return to their homes in 12 months or so now it could take up to 24 months," UNHCR's Arjun Jain said.

``This is clearly the biggest threat to civilian life especially south of the Litani river."

Clark said that Israel fired around 3,000 bombs, rockets, and artillery a day into Lebanon in the early days of the war, rising to some 6,000 a day at the end, with around 40 percent of the cluster bomblets dropped on the south failing to explode.

Also yesterday, commanders of the peacekeeping force said that Israeli troops should be out of Lebanon within days.
© Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - JFK vs. The Federal Reserve
by Anthony Wayne -

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business.

The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage - signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency - money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: 'to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.' This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the united States of America.

United States Notes' were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a 'Federal Reserve Note' issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a 'United States Note' from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says 'Federal Reserve Note' on the top while the other says 'United States Note'. Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.

President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper 'currency' circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new 'money'. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.

Truncated, for the complete article, see:

2) Impeach the President – VT Congress Candidate Stands Up

- - Please cancel my subscription to Counterpunch
- - 9/11 Mysteries – Free-Fall Buildings Analyzed
- - “Improbable Collapse” Released!

- - Impeach the President – VT Congress Candidate Stands Up

My name is Dennis Morrisseau.

I'm an old war horse and a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives from Vermont
who believes we must impeach Bush and Cheney, and we must remove the neoconservative cabal from power.

Our great nation has suffered a coup.

And there is an immediate need for action and for the piercing of illusions. We need to step across
old political boundaries and ideas. Who cares about "Democrats" vs. "Republicans"?
The leadership of both parties is thoroughly corrupt. And that "leadership"
exercises its power through control of Congress, not the presidency.

Dennis Morrisseau's web site:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Vermont Congressional Candidate Calls For Arrest of Bush and Cheney by U.S. Military

Former Army Lieutenant and a candidate for Congress in VT, Dennis Morrisseau of W. Pawlet, today called for the arrest of President Bush and Vice President Cheney by the American military "if necessary" to prevent an unauthorized attack upon the nation of Iran.

"American forces are apparently already active inside Iran, and Naval forces have received orders to deploy to that country," Morrisseau said. "The President has NO AUTHORITY to attack the nation of Iran whatsoever, in the absense of a full, formal Declaration of War on Iran by the sitting Congress," Morrisseau said. He said any order for an attack upon Iran or to deploy naval forces to its coastal waters is illegal, and called upon Officers of the American military to "First, refuse to obey such an order. "If the president persists and insists on ordering our forces into combat in or over Iran without a formal Declaration of War, then I call upon General Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and upon such other military officers as clearly see their duty in these circumstances to detain both the President and Vice President, until such time as the Congress shall act."

Morrisseau, a Congressional candidate who was Court-Martialled for opposition to the Vietnam War in 1968, said he has written to General Pace to ask for the intervention of the military. "In spite of my opposition to the Vietnam War and the Court-Martial which we ultimately defeated, I was a good soldier who had the respect of my superior officers throughout the ordeal. And they had mine!" Morrisseau said. There are many many, very, very decent people in the active duty military. I know this," he said, "people who love their country and democracy too and hate war."

Morrisseau wrote that "Iran is no present threat to us or anyone. Their right to enrich uranium under treaties signed by us is clear and that is all they have so far done. An attack upon that nation now by us, acting alone will constitute an illegal war of aggression under international law. It is illegal under our law as well. I urge you to so advise the President," Morrisseau wrote to Pace," and urge that he take no such actions. In particular, he must not act in the absence of a full, formal, responsible War Declaration by Congress. That is the Constitutional requirement." If he and Cheney persist, Morrisseau wrote, "than the country must rely upon you, Sir and our armed forces generally, to resist all illegal orders by Bush or Cheney, and take the gentlemen into custody if necessary.

Dennis Morrisseau
Lieutenant Morrisseau's Rebellion
Running AT Congress (in VT)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Please cancel my subscription to Counterpunch
By David Caputo

Dear Counterpunch,

I'm not sure what your deal is with the 9/11 (lack of) investigation, but I can no longer support with my money people who seem to go out of their way to attack progressives who are suspicious of the official 9/11 story and its direct link to not just one but two wars of conquest the USA has engaged in since then.

Do you really think that the 9/11 Commission Report was anything other than a systematic coverup?

Alex did not, of course, reprint my letter to him in his column, he chose an outrageous and inarticulate example of the genre, and then smeared the rest of us with it.

In addition to being called a racist "nut" because I've done things like read your newsletter for the past several years (which helped my overall distrust of this administration and the permanent government that carries out its policies), I don't appreciate how you give aid and comfort to our mutual enemies by discrediting even their most reasoned and articulate opponents.

Most 9/11 official story disbelievers want Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al in PRISON for their 9/11 and subsequent crimes. We know they've killed many more people SINCE that day than ON that day. We are not stupid.

Don't you'all want them arrested too? For similar reasons? I just don't get your approach here.

I agree with almost all of your points about the evils of US foreign policy and corporate greed, but think that 9/11 is the ultimate argument they have to justify what they are doing as understandable, even necessary, because of the "external" nature of the "attacks" and "threat".

Haven't you ever heard of "false flag terror operations"? Do you think that they're always just another "wild conspiracy theory"?

Didn't you guys ever hear of the Reichstag fire? Doesn't this situation even remotely resemble that one? Would you have ridiculed the "communists did it" theory debunkers back then too?

It would have been no defense for you. You'all would have been rounded up shortly after your political usefulness had expired. After all those debunkers had been rounded up, tortured, and killed.

Am I really that far off base here?

How can you use such weak arguments to "debunk" the 9/11 skeptics case and think that progressive intellectuals will buy it?

Joann Wypijewski's article is so totally lame in this regard that it's almost laughable. And what's with ridiculing activists who say "do the research on the internet" by people who make a living off people who already do just that. Don't you folks realize you're a web site where people do political research too? Huh?

How about you guys do a point-by-point study of the 9/11 Commission report and compare your analysis of the document with David Ray Griffin's.

Really, I dare you. Now THAT I would be interested in reading.

How about a review of Paul Thompson's Complete 9/11 Timeline? Has anyone on staff actually read it? Don't you think it's credible and respectable journalism? Is he a "nut" too?

Right now, I'm pretty disgusted. If you guys are so totally bought off or brain dead or full of yourselves up in "Counterpunch Tower" that you can't even consider the 9/11 researchers and activists to be thoughtful concerned citizens and allies worthy of your support, then creeping Fascism has already reached the salon.

Until I hear otherwise, I'll put my financial resources elsewhere, and encourage others to do the same.

Please cancel my subscription.

Thank you,

David Caputo
Positronic Design


= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - 9/11 Mysteries – Free-Fall Buildings Analyzed

“911 Mysteries - Part 1: Demolitions

The site posted this following account on 911 Mysteries:

This film is a powerhouse of information presented in the most professional, objective, and non-confrontational manner. It is 90 minutes of pure demolition evidence and analysis, laced with staggering witness testimonials. Moving from "the myth" through "the analysis" and into "the players," its careful deconstruction of the official story is presented through clean, clear science. The 9/11 picture is not one of politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple physics. How do you get a 10-second 110-story pancake collapse? Consider Willie Rodriguez's strange recollection of noises on the 34th floor. Who was up there, bumping around? Hear Scott Forbes' similar story, weeks before the towers fell. See how blasting is done and how it applies to the towers destruction.

This film is available to watch online and you can get DVDs
from the film’s producer, and help support the completion
of two additional films on 9/11

Thursday, October 19th, 7pm at the Media Education Foundation
The 9/11 Truth Alliance will be showing:

911 Mysteries

Part 1: Demolitions

David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor, stated it was:

"Excellent. The best of the 9/11 movies."

Steven E. Jones, physics professor, Brigham Young University, stated:

"WOW! is my reaction to this movie. Great insight
into demolitions and what really happened on 9/11/2001."

And founder for Scholars for 911 Truth, James H. Fetzer, claimed it was:

"An outstanding contribution to understanding 9/11. Simply superb."

For more on this and other films, see:

The mission of the 911dvdproject is to help spread understanding of 9/11/01 events
through the distribution of DVDs that educate the viewer about the many still
unanswered questions and little known facts that remain concerning 9/11.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
For a comprehensive collection of FREE downloadable
or viewable Videos on 9-11, see:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

For a DVD with Professor Steven Jones’ lecture on WTC collapse,
and other 911 truth film resources, for only $1 plus mailing, contact:
Jeremy Lynes - - Telephone (404)892 7114

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - “Improbable Collapse” Released!

The following is from Newsletter -- Week of 10/2/2006

The long-awaited final version of Mike Berger’s powerful documentary Improbable Collapse has been released. Ordering information is available at both the home page of and at

"Immediately after 9/11, the verdict was in: A combination of fires and structural damage caused the progressive collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. For many that watched the events in horror, however, the striking similarity to controlled demolitions was immediately apparent . . . and persistently haunting.

"Now, after five years of research, the hypothesis that controlled demolitions brought these buildings down has gained significant attention.

"Improbable Collapse is the only film to dismantle the official story about the collapse of the 3 WTC buildings using the government’s own reports. Based on the research of Dr. Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan and Jim Hoffman, the more likely explanation is controlled demolition.

"It is our hope that this information will empower the viewer to take action to defend their rights and their country. The Improbable Collapse DVD also includes an additional 20 minute film about the NYFD radio scandal that to this day has never been investigated.

"The film features Dr. Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, James Hoffman, Dr. David Ray Griffin, Glenn Corbett, Mark Jacobson and William Veale, shot in New York City, Provo, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Toronto, Chicago and Indianapolis."

For more resources to get the truth out, see:
Films that Make a Difference!

Translate this Page!

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and not necessarily those of Flyby News.
A "Fair Use Policy" that describes FNs' use of copyrighted material is posted at
Your feedback for story suggestions and networking Flyby News are welcomed and appreciated.
You can write to the publisher/editor Jonathan Mark via email:
If you would like to receive more Flyby News alerts for the New England
region, send an email to & insert "subscribe" in subject

Flyby News is educational and nonviolent in focus, and has supported critical campaigns
for a healthy environment, human rights, justice, peace, and nonviolence,
since the launching of NASA's Cassini space probe in 1997.

=====News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era====>

= = = = = = = = = = =

Email address: