Flyby News Home - Flyby News Archives - Casinni NoFlyby - Flyby Links

Flyby  News

"News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era"

Misprision Treason or Justice * Truth or War

30 March 2010

"..What about Vietnam? And I knew that I could never again raise
my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos
without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor
of violence in the world today, my own government."

- Martin Luther King, Jr.

Riverside Church, April 4th, 1967

29 March 2010 - Democracy Now! - Amy Goodman
As Obama Visits Afghanistan,
Tavis Smiley on Rev. Martin Luther King
and His Opposition to the Vietnam War

On March 31, 2010 PBS aired Tavis Smiley’s special
MARTIN LUTHER KING: A Call to Conscience

1) 9-11 Truth, Peace, and Freedom, or To Hell With America
- - Covering up American War Crimes, From Baghdad to New York
- - Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice April Newsletter
- - New Kevin Ryan Essay with Intro by Don Paul
- - American Behavioral Scientist: “State Crimes Against Democracy”
- - New Research on State Crimes Against Democracy
- - Evidence of Treason - Misprision Citizens Action
2) US and Israel Arms Deal Corruption Undeniable
- - U.S. and Israel sign a massive arms deal
- - Is there evidence of a moon landing hoax?
3) Critical Breaking News [Links]

Editor’s Notes:

FN is part of the movement to expose deep government corruption that could 'pull' off such an event like September 11, 2001 with military-grade nano-thermite explosives, and be able to blame it on a CIA derivative group called Al-Qaeda. I believe it is time to go on record and officially file Misprision of Treason EVIDENCE, and write a letter to local newspapers to explain your actions. Renewing a commitment to truth and reality is part of being a responsible and free individual. Will even subtle fears and mind control dictate how we respond, or will the actual facts in the case, which were used to justify launching devastating wars, be the deciding factor?

9/11 Crime - Misprision - Citizens Action
Click following for most recent PDF file copy
A Call for Truth Over Treason
Stop War by exposing the 9/11 Cover-up

Please note the new article by Christopher Story, and the Jerry Mazza new article on US and Israel escalating dangers everywhere, plus upcoming program on MLK. How did Israel obtain nuclear weapons? Everyone knows, but the hypocrisy reeks of something perverse. Note, too, the must-see investigative film documentary, George Bush Sr. and the Assassination of JFK. The corrupt evil connections since WWII are becoming undeniably evident. News in the post Cassini flyby era is turning rapidly, and either things will get much better or much worse, staying this present course is impossible.

29 March 2010 - OnLineJournal - Jerry Mazza
U.S. and Israel

a massive arms deal

Financial Analysis - World Reports - Christopher Story
29 March 2010
Senator Arlen Specter Invokes Misprision of Felony

Paranoid Shift
Special article by Michael Hasty
Special Film by John Hankey

Dark Legacy
George Bush and the Assassination of JFK

"To open ourselves to the truth and to bring ourselves face to face
with our personal and collective reality is not an option that can be
accepted or rejected. It is an undeniable requirement of all people
and all societies that seek to humanize themselves and to be free.."

-- Guatemalan Bishop Juan Jose Gerardi Conedera
Assassinated April 25, 1998, one day after his speech (and above quote),
when he presented his findings of an in-depth probe into a campaign of
terror against the people of Guatemala waged by their own government.

1) 9-11 Truth, Peace, and Freedom, or To Hell With America

- - Covering up American War Crimes, From Baghdad to New York
- - Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice April Newsletter
- - New Kevin Ryan Essay with Intro by Don Paul
- - American Behavioral Scientist: “State Crimes Against Democracy”
- - New Research on State Crimes Against Democracy
- - Evidence of Treason - Misprision Citizens Action

- - Covering up American War Crimes, From Baghdad to New York
By Charles Glass

March 25, 2010 "Taki's" -- BBC correspondent John Simpson reported on March 4 that the number of defects in newborn babies in the Iraqi town of Fallujah had risen dramatically since the American assault there at the end of 2004. Some people in the town blame the abnormalities in their children on whatever chemicals the US Marines may have used in their conquest of the Sunni Muslim redoubt. Dr. Samira al-Ani, a paediatrician at Fallujah’s General Hospital, told Simpson that two or three children were born each day with serious cardiac problems. Before the first American attack on Fallujah in two years earlier, she noticed similar ailments in one baby every two months. “I have nothing documented,” she admitted, “but I can tell you that year by year the number [is] increasing.”

The Iraqi government, which supported the American attack with troops of its own, denies there has been any increase. “The US military authorities,” Simpson said, “are absolutely correct when they say they are not aware of any official reports indicating an increase in birth defects in Fallujah­no official reports exist.” Nor are any likely to. By any standard, though, this was a big story. John Simpson is a serious journalist and a friend, and I listened carefully to his report that morning on the BBC World Service. I waited in vain for the New York Times, Washington Post, and other serious American journals to take up the story. All I read was a brief item on the CBS News website quoting Simpson.

“The US government does not want it known that it was using chemicals on human beings in a country whose leader it overthrew ostensibly because he retained the capacity to do the same thing.”

The US denied it anyway, perhaps out of habit. Military spokesman Michael Fitzpatrick responded predictably, “No studies to date have indicated environmental issues resulting in specific health issues.” But, as Simpson said, there have not been any studies. American spokesmen were reluctantly forced to admit the use of White Phosphorous­or Willie Pete, as the troops call it­in Fallujah when someone noticed that Field Artillery Magazine, a U. S. Army publication, had already documented its deployment in its March/April 2005 edition. The magazine wrote, “We fired ‘shake and bake’ missions at the insurgents, using WP [White Phosphorous] to flush them out and HE [High Explosives] to take them out.” After Dahr Jamail, a brilliant freelance journalist, reported during the battle in 2004 that American forces were using WP on Iraqis, Project Censored gave him an award for the second most under-reported story of the year. It is still under-reported, but it is not difficult to understand why. The US government does not want it known that it was using chemicals on human beings in a country whose leader it overthrew ostensibly because he retained the capacity to do the same thing. And the US Treasury does not want to compensate foreigners for any harm its troops might have done. Let us turn now to New York and what has become the secular-sacred site of the former World Trade Center.

The government this month finally settled claims by 10,000 workers on the Ground Zero clean-up by agreeing to pay $657.5 million for the debilitating effects of the asbestos and other poisons they were exposed to. That’s an average of $65,750 a head, less the lawyers’ share. It doesn’t sound like much, but they’re doing better than anyone in Fallujah. There are precedents for government resistance to admitting responsibility. American Vietnam veterans crippled by the dioxin they dropped all over Vietnam waited many years for the government to acknowledge their plight. At first, the government resisted the connection between dioxin and the veterans’ cancer, Parkinson’s, and other fatal illnesses. By the time the government paid anything, the vets were observing that their children were being born with severe birth defects from dioxin in Agent Orange and other herbicides unleashed on the South Vietnamese countryside. Their children’s congenital deformities included spina bifida and other horrors that may go for generations to come. The Department of Veterans Affairs didn’t send them any money until 2003­thirty years after the last barrel of poison was dropped on Vietnam. Even that was restricted to 7,520 of the 99,226 veterans who claimed to have been affected.

While dioxin disabled thousands of American service personnel who merely handled it, as many as 4.8 million Vietnamese endured twenty-eight million gallons of toxic rain that drenched their skins, soaked their soil, and polluted their rivers and groundwater for ten years. As with the American war vets, then-unborn children were also affected. Vietnam has one of the world’s highest levels of birth defects, concentrated in the south where the American forced deployed most of the chemicals. Five children out of one hundred are born with serious abnormalities, including missing limbs, spina bifida, twisted or missing internal organs and grotesque malformations that have made their survival impossible. While reluctantly accepting a link between dioxin and birth defects in American service personnel’s children, the US denies any connection when it comes to Vietnamese. I guess it’s just one of those strange anomalies that nature throws up every so often, like Los Angeles police chief Daryl Gates’ observation that the disproportion in African-American deaths from the police choking was due to the fact that “blacks might be more likely to die from chokeholds because their arteries do not open as fast as they do on ‘normal people’.” Perhaps Vietnamese born after 1961, when Operation Ranch Hand to defoliate South Vietnam began, were just not normal anyway.

The abnormal people of Iraq remember that the US denied Saddam Hussein’s use of chemical weapons on its Kurdish citizens. In those days, Saddam was an American ally. When freelance journalist Gwynne Roberts brought back the soil samples from Hallabja that proved Saddam has gassed the Kurds, the US blamed the Iranians. That assessment became inoperative when condemning Saddam was politically useful. Now that the US has been caught using chemicals in the same country that the monster Saddam did, it admits using them on “insurgents” but not on civilians. It is hard in a city to blast chemicals at the people with guns and miss those who don’t have any. No matter. The US and Iraqi governments are blocking an investigation that would prove one way or another that White Phosphorous did any harm to Iraqi mothers and their children. It’s unlikely they’ll receive a cent for the next fifty years, if ever. But why the hell isn’t this a big story?

©2009 Taki's Magazine.
Original post -

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice April Newsletter - April, 2010


- - New Kevin Ryan Essay with Intro by Don Paul

Demolition Access to the WTC Towers:Part Four – Clean Up
by Kevin R. Ryan

In addition to the actual placement of explosives, those involved would need to clean up any evidence of explosives remaining at the site. In this final essay of a multi-part series, it will be seen that certain people had the means, opportunity and motive to destroy such evidence at Ground Zero, and that something was being hidden after the buildings fell. These facts will be reviewed in light of the knowledge that the debris was considered highly sensitive and nearly all the steel evidence was quickly destroyed.

Read the full essay here. See all four essays starting here.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - American Behavioral Scientist: “State Crimes Against Democracy”

In Denial of Democracy: Social Psychological Implications for Public Discourse on State Crimes Against Democracy Post-9/11
by Laurie A. Manwell

To preserve what is left of North American democracy—and our responsibility for tolerance and restraint toward citizens of nondemocratic states—the culture of fear and political intolerance and a governing dissociative mindset of “democracy for the few” must be subjected to immediate serious public scrutiny and debate. This must begin with the thorough and scientific vetting of evidence that contradicts the U.S. government’s official account of 9/11, on which two wars of aggression have been predicated, with the possibility of a third looming in the near future; for it was this event, more than any other in modern history, that has precipitated an epochal change in the social psychology of “We, the People.”

See full article here, and discussion here.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - New Research on State Crimes Against Democracy
by Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff

Credible scientific evidence brings into question the possibility that some aspects of the events of 9/11 involved State Crimes Against Democracy. Psychologically, this is a very hard concept for Americans to even consider. However, ignoring the issue in the context of multiple proven SCADs since World War II seems far more dangerous for democracy than the consequences of future scientific inquiry and transparent, fact-based investigative reporting. Anything short of complete, open discourse based on all the evidence about these critical issues in our society relating to the possible continuation of SCADs is simply a matter of censorship.

See full article here.

For complete Newsletter, see:

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Evidence of Treason

The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) reported that World Trade Center 7 collapsed due to fire damage. If that is the case, it would be the first steel-framed skyscraper in history to undergo total collapse from fire alone. The fact that NIST refused to even consider explosive demolition when it is the most likely hypothesis and fits all of the available evidence is, in and of itself, grounds for suspicion of a cover-up. Fire doesn’t pulverize 90,000 tons of concrete to powder. Explosives do. Crucial evidence from the World Trade Center crime scene, including most of the steel from WTC 1, 2 and 7, was deliberately shipped away and destroyed before it could be properly examined.

The Twin Towers collapsed too rapidly and with too much violence for the NIST explanation to be even remotely valid; the temperatures attained during the destruction were much too high; the acceleration of the buildings during their collapses was much too smooth. Well over one hundred first responders witnessed explosions at the on-set of the collapses. Small chips of nano-thermitic composite materials – a highly sophisticated explosive, has been found and documented by an international team of scientists in large quantities in the dust of the debris at the World Trade Center.

This work is published in Open Chemistry/Physics Journal, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe." One of its authors, Niels H. Harrit in a German interview in May 2009, said: "There are no experts on nano-thermite without connections to the military…. This stuff has only been prepared under military contracts in the USA and probably in bigger allied countries. This is secret military research…It was not prepared in a cave in Afghanistan."

Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission, John Farmer, disclosed in his book, The Ground Truth “ some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.” Whenever contact is lost with any airplane, fighter jets routinely take to the air to investigate. This commonly occurs about 100 times per year in well under 20 minutes. But on 9/11 nearly two hours passed without any interception.

There were also warnings of the impending attacks from other countries; plus insiders such as John Ashcroft, top military officers, and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown were warned not to fly. Additional evidence of foreknowledge came from insider trading. Shortly before 9/11, tens of millions that were made by Put options on American Airlines show 99% probability of illegal insider trading.

Evidence meant to implicate 19 Arabs as hijackers of four planes (passports, business cards, and so on) alleged to have survived the fiery plane impacts is not credible and suggests a staged crime scene. Furthermore, since seven alleged hijackers were housed on US military bases, two lived with an undercover FBI agent, and many others, like alleged flight 93 pilot Ziad Samir Jarrah, were brought over to flight school in Florida by CIA agents, we must conclude that the training was part of a cover story concocted by US intelligence, and that most of these 9/11 alleged hijackers were NOT involved, or were unwitting patsies, to say nothing of the nine who showed up still alive AFTER 9/11. Hundreds of contradictions exist that were omitted in the official version.

18 USC Sec. 2382. Misprision of treason -

”Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”
Open Chemistry/Physics Journal

“Did nano-thermite take down the WTC?”
Interview with Dr. Niels Harrit; Published by RT, 21 January 2010

The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7, Why the Final Official Report about 9/11 is Unscientific and False
By David Ray Griffin

"9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, The A Critique of the Kean-Zelikow Report"
David Ray Griffin -

118 Firefighters' Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers

Kolar, Jay, "What We Now Know about the Alleged 9-11 Hijackers", in The Hidden History of 9-11,
2nd edition, P. Zarembka, editor, New York: Seven Stories Press, 2008, pp. 3-44 and 293-304.

Poteshman, Allen M., "Unusual Option Market Activity and the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001",
Journal of Business, Vol. 79, no. 4, 2006, pp. 1703-1726.

9/11 Crime - Misprision - Citizens Action
Click following for most recent PDF file copy
A Call for Truth Over Treason
Stop War by exposing the 9/11 Cover-up

2) US and Israel Arms Deal Corruption Undeniable

- - U.S. and Israel sign a massive arms deal
- - Is there evidence of a moon landing hoax?

- - U.S. and Israel sign a massive arms deal
By Jerry Mazza

Online Journal Associate Editor
Mar 29, 2010, 00:33

Here, I thought the U.S. and Israel were ready to go 15 rounds in the Garden (not Eden).

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insulted Vice President Biden, Middle East envoy George Mitchell, plus Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Clinton warned Netanyahu that the building of more settlements in the West Bank definitely will slow peace efforts. Netanyahu basically said who cares.

And then I read this HAARETZ headline: Despite row, U.S. and Israel sign massive arms deal. What, so they can use them on us? You gotta be kidding. But no, there it is, in the first paragraph: As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was in Washington this week absorbing the full wrath of the Obama administration, the Pentagon and Israels defense establishment were in the process of sealing a large arms deal. Sounds like theyre playing, good cop, bad cop, nest-ce pas?

Well, isnt that special, Dana Carveys Church Lady smiles from cyberspace and asks, Now, who could be behind that? (Beat) Saaatan? Well, it certainly sounds like the great dissembler. As Haaretz says, According to the deal, Israel will purchase three new Hercules C-130J airplanes. The deal for the three aircrafts, designed by Lockheed Martin, is worth roughly a quarter of a billion dollars. Each aircraft costs $70 million. Ugh, I think, worth a quarter of a billion bucks, each plane $70 million? What? Whos paying for this deal?

Well, the deal, it turns out will be covered by American foreign assistance funds. What does that mean? Were fronting them the money to buy our planes? Kiss my tassels.

And look at this: The aircrafts were manufactured specifically for Israeli needs, and include a large number of systems produced by Israels defense industry. What? When? Three new planes, $70 million each? They didnt make these in a minute. Who ever heard? Well who ever said that you need to know what the Pentagon is doing? It is top secret, not for schlimazels like you, you taxpayer, you American senior citizen, useless eater. Youre lucky youve got your Social Security and Medicare for another year. Then it all goes to Bnai Brith. Arrrrrgh!

And what are the Israelis special needs besides bombing Palestinians? Well, how about bombing the Iranians. Bombing the Jordanians, the Syrians, and the whole megillah? The Pentagon has got to be nuts. Or, once again, the Pentagon is letting little Israel play the big stick for them in the Middle East.

Listen to this: The Pentagon will issue a formal announcement on the matter on Thursday vening. Thats it, just like that? We dont vote, we dont know, were handing these vipers more deadly weapons, more money? Are you serious, Haaretz? Well, dont shoot the messenger.

Right, but it says, America and Israel have still not reached an agreement regarding the purchase of the Lockheed F-35 war plane. It is still not clear when that deal, which is estimated to be worth more than $3 billion, will finally be sealed and carried out.

But dont we give these characters $3 billiion a year to buy war crap? Is this it? And we have to front them even more for the first deal? And were supposed to not be angry at these goons for trying to gobble up the West Bank. Is Obama getting head from Monica Lewinski? Whats going on: Three Lockhead F-35s; three new Hercules C-130J airplanes?

And this for the country that does more spying on us than any nation, friend or enemy? Are we serious? What are those guys smoking at the Pentagon and whos supplying them?

And heres the capper. If that deal is signed in the near future, Israel will likely receive its first F-35 in 2014.

If that deal is sealed, wait a minute? Ho, hold on, thats my, thats our tax money, putz! Seal your lips before I get the Five Dancing Israelis to dance on your heads while we document Israel going up in smoke, not just the World Trade Center. These guys were videotaping one of their buddies dancing on a white moving fan in New Jersey, dancing and flicking his lighter as the towers burned and fell in the background.

And these schlimazels walked away after they were arrested for a couple of months, cold as stone, no remorse, nothing. And the FBI stood there with their hands on their privates, doing, saying nothing, as the boyz were extradited to Israel and claiming on TV there that they were to document the event. How did they know there was going to be an event to document, particularly one of those tragic proportions? How, Secretary Gates, tell me?

See, heres what I believe. The reason we throw more and more money at Israel is because Israel, the Mossad, does all this dirty business for us, including helping to wipe out the WTC on 9/11. Larry Silverstein and Frank Loewy, his partner, the lessees of the WTC, are now reaching a new deal with the Port Authority for more money to build Towers 2 and 3, after they received $4.5 billion in insurance, and Larry another $500 million in insurance on Tower 7, which he built five stories higher and wider immediately. This is a cash cow for Silverstein and his buddies. That and other little assignments the dual Israel/American citizens and Mossad are so good at pulling off.

So by now you think Im an anti-Semite saying this? No, everything Ive said is the truth. When you tell the truth, fact, about someone that isnt a religious or ethnic slur. Its just the truth. Throw them all in jail. Go ahead. I am an American citizen. This is my country. And I dont want my country associated with these murderers.

In fact, Id like to know why so few people picked up on former US Marine Corps grunt Gordon Duff, who writes for Veterans Today, interviewing USMC Vietnam vet, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former director of studies at the US Army War College, about his military knowledge that Israel Did It, that is 9/11, and has the potential to launch a nuclear strike. The Mossad, he claims, took down the towers with help of the CIA. Sabrosky, who is Jewish, but also a fiercely loyal American, is seething at the Israelis.

So, bottom line, it all comes back to following the money, and asking why were bowing to Israel, spotting them for billions for more high-powered, advanced tech planes, especially when theyve thumbed their noses at our orders to not keep building new settlements in Palestine.
Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer and life-long resident of New York City. Reach him at His new book, State Of Shock: Poems from 9/11 on is available at , Amazon or

Copyright 1998-2007 Online Journal

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Is there evidence of a moon landing hoax?

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon
by Bart Sibrel - film running time - 47 minutes

Flyby News has provided screenings and discussions of a controversial film alleging a moon-landing hoax. The moon is 240,000 miles away from Earth. The space shuttle has never gone more than 400 miles from our atmosphere. Except for Apollo astronauts;, no humans even claim to have gone beyond low-earth orbit. When the space shuttle astronauts did get to an altitude of 400 miles, the radiation of the Van Allen belts forced them to a lower altitude. CNN reported: "The radiation belts surrounding Earth may be more dangerous for astronauts than previously believed (like when they supposedly went through them thirty years ago to reach the Moon.) The phenomenon known as the 'Van Allen Belts' can spawn (newly discovered) 'Killer Electrons' that can dramatically affect the astronauts' health."

In a recent (2008) article in the Guardian (UK), a science correspondent wrote: "The question of how to fend off the solar wind has been given some urgency by an international plan - the Global Exploration Strategy, signed by 14 space agencies including those of Britain, China, France and the US - to return to the moon and send astronauts further into space. George Bush has committed the US to a return trip to the moon by 2020.." So why after the supposed multiple successful lunar landing and take-offs has humans remained in low orbit, since the 1972 and Apollo missions ended; is it coincidence that these missions ended when Russia and other countries had the technology in place to confirm a human moon landing and take-off. According to Bart Jordan, at that time NASA did not have the technology to lift off the moon even if they landed on it, and survived the intense Van Allen Earth-Sun magnetic radiation belt.

What is unique about Bart Sibrel’s film, besides its artistic blending of images demonstrating the hubris of humankind throughout the ages, and the current events of the arms race, Vietnam War, race riots, but he also presented some mislabeled, unedited, behind-the-scenes footage from NASA showing the crew of Apollo 11 'staging a shot of being half-way to the moon.' The quote used in his film from George Orwell’s book, 1984, is very apropos: "Those who control the future control the past." It may be time for another look back to what many of us believed once was true. Did man really land on the moon?

Valley 9/11 Truth & Flyby News
present films and discussions:
"The Revolution Will Not Be Televised"
Above film begins at 7:00 PM and following, at 9:00 PM:
"A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon"
Wednesday, April 14, 2010; meeting at 6:00 PM
Media Education Foundation, Northampton, MA

Moon Landing Conspiracy YouTube Channel

The official web site for the film is

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


During an interview with Stanley Kubrick's widow an extraordinary story came to light. She claims Kubrick and other Hollywood producers were recruited to help the U.S. win the high stakes race to the moon. In order to finance the space program through public funds, the U.S. government needed huge popular support, and that meant they couldn't afford any expensive public relations failures. Fearing that no live pictures could be transmitted from the first moon landing, President Nixon enlisted the creative efforts of Kubrick, whose 2001: a Space Odyssey (1968) had provided much inspiration, to ensure promotional opportunities wouldn't be missed. In return, Kubrick got a special NASA lens to help him shoot Barry Lyndon (1975). A subtle blend of facts, fiction and hypothesis around the first landing on the moon, Dark Side Of The Moon illustrates how the truth can be twisted by the manipulation of images.

Dark Side Of The Moon is written and directed by William Karel and co-produced by Point du Jour Production and ARTE France.

For more on this and a YouTube video clip, see:

For dozens of more resources on this issue, see:


28 March 2010 - VIDEO - 911blogger
9-11 Truth makes HUGE appearance
at Los Angeles Anti-War March

25 March 2010 - Taki Magazine - Information Clearinghouse
Covering up American War Crimes,
From Baghdad to New York

The US government does not want it known
that it was using chemicals on human beings
in a country whose leader it overthrew ostensibly
because he retained the capacity to do the same thing.

24 June 2006 - VIDEO - John McMurtry
Why The Facts Of 9/11 Are Suppressed

17 March 2010 - Raw Story - 911blogger
Revealed: Ashcroft, Tenet, Rumsfeld
warned 9/11 Commission about
'line' it 'should not cross'

21 March 2010 - Washington Post - 911blogger
FBI false flag terror
plot exposed in court

16 March 2010 - William Veale, Esq. - 911blogger
April Gallop's case on 9/11-Pentagon thrown out!
Judge Chin has just dismissed the Gallop case.
He said that the allegations are frivolous and
based on fantasy and delusion.

Former Minnesota governor and one-time professional wrestler
Jesse Ventura has run afoul of the Huffington Post's no-
conspiracy-theory policy, and he's not happy about it.
12 March 2010 - Raw Story - Video (RT) - 911blogger
Jesse Ventura:
'You're not allowed to ask' about 9/11

12 March 2010 - NYCCAN - Bob McIlvaine
Join the "Building What?!" campaign!

May 14-16, 2010 * CONFERENCE * Santa Cruz, CA
Understanding Deep Politics
Behind World Events and Creating Alternative Solutions

25 March 2010 - Truthout - John Pilger
Have a Nice World War, Folks

22 March 2010 - Rock Creek Free Press - 911blogger
9/11 Truth Goes Primetime
By Sheila Casey

Space for Peace and September 11
Connecting dots to democracy or to genocide

New 9/11 Investigation vs New World Order
P e r s p e c t i v e - R e s o u r c e s - A r c h i v e s

"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution
of the United States as our Fathers made it inviolate. The people
of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress
and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to
overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

-- Abraham Lincoln

The views expressed herein are writers' own and not necessarily of Flyby News.
Fair Use Policy that describes use of copyrighted material is at
Feedback for story suggestions and networking Flyby News is appreciated.
You can write to the editor by email: - flyby(at}mtdata{dot)com -

Flyby News is educational and nonviolent in focus,
and has supported critical campaigns for a healthy
environment, human rights, justice, and nonviolence,
since the launch of NASA's Cassini space probe in 1997.

=====News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era====>

= = = = = = = = = =

Email address: